Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin

[Stefan Monnier]

> But when there's nothing to commit, I'd expect vc-next-action to
> update from upstream.

Yes, indeed, in some rare cases it can indeed notice that commit is not
an option and suggest something else.

> So calling it "vc-commit" would be wrong, and removing the update
> (a.k.a. "checkout") part from it would also be wrong, IMO.

That's why I said I was not 100% serious.  Still, AFAIK in typical usage
of modern VCS, vc-next-action ends up doing a commit about 99% of the
time, and its "dwim" behavior is largely useless.


        Stefan