[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: burden of maintainance
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: burden of maintainance |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Oct 2015 23:53:53 +0300 |
> From: Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 21:16:58 +0200
>
> > When all of these are implemented, then yes, writing display tests
> > should be relatively easy. But today all this infrastructure doesn't
> > exist. We don't even have its detailed design.
>
> That's obviously not what I've head in mind. But I don't think that's
> an area where we need a special focus on tests. At least I have the
> feeling that there are only few bugs wrt. the display engine.
I wish this were true. Bugs are still being reported, albeit at a low
frequency.
But a good test suite is required not only to find existing bugs, it
is also required to be sure changes we make to introduce new features
don't introduce bugs in what was previously correct behavior.
- Re: burden of maintainance, (continued)
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, joakim, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: burden of maintainance, Chad Brown, 2015/10/08
Re: burden of maintainance, Helmut Eller, 2015/10/08
Re: burden of maintainance, Phillip Lord, 2015/10/08