Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>  address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:34:31 +0300
> 
> On 09/30/2015 05:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Maybe we should simply leave the locking VCSes out of this.  People
> > who use those back-ends have used vc-next-action for a long time, so I
> > guess they won't really need vc-steal-lock.
> 
> Well, there are not too many key bindings we can use. Being able to bind 
> vc-checkin to `C-x v v' instead of `vc-next-action' would be nice.

AFAICS, "C-x v c" and "C-x v C" are both available, and should be good
candidates for vc-checkin, I think.

> IMO, it's the main argument in favor of deprecating the latter command.
> 
> > IOW, let's make vc-checkin interactive so that it assumes the files
> > are not locked by someone else.  WDYT?
> 
> Do we make a separate binding for it?

Yes, I think so.  It's an important VC command.