[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: burden of maintainance
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
Re: burden of maintainance |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Oct 2015 15:00:18 +0800 |
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Przemysław Wojnowski
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> "make check" is part of the GNU Coding Standards. See:
>
> Maybe it should be changed to conform to the rest of the world, making
> it intuitive at the same time.
>
> IMHO the name should reveal its intent and "check" doesn't tell what is
> it checking (maybe whether environment is ready for compilation?).
I think (but I'm not sure) most users who can compile software with
`configure' followed by `make' know that `configure' scans the build
environment and tests whether environment is ready for compilation.
> "make test" is understandable and intuitive, especially to anyone who
> has any experience building software in other environments.
I agree that "make test" is intuitive. I'll start a discussion on
address@hidden
- Re: burden of maintainance, (continued)
- Re: burden of maintainance, Helmut Eller, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Phillip Lord, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Xue Fuqiao, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance,
Xue Fuqiao <=
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: burden of maintainance, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08