[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New maintainer
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: New maintainer |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:33:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 06.10.2015 um 06:30 schrieb Dmitry Gutov:
>> On 10/06/2015 04:15 AM, Paul Nathan wrote:
>>
>>> Using SLIME and the Rust completion user interfaces is still a subpar
>>> UI experience compared to IntelliJ or VS.
>>
>> You might want to clarify that statement in more detail. Creating a
>> bug report would be best.
>
> Decisions where to head into these area train considerable investments.
> Complex questions can't be rolled into a simple bug-report. Also it
> surpasses a feature request.
Andreas, with all respect, this statement is untrue. We are talking
software here, not rocked science. The reason it is better can be broken
down into a set of independent functionalities, that makes it betterᵀᴹ.
For each feature in this set you can make a bug request. In order to make
any progress, you've got to break down the problem into its parts.
Rasmus
--
Dung makes an excellent fertilizer
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Yates, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, John Yates, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/12
- Re: New maintainer, Paul Nathan, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer,
Rasmus <=
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/09
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
Re: New maintainer, Nicolas Petton, 2015/10/08