[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:36 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:11:57 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I indeed think that we should have infrastructure to turn on a major
> > mode in a region of a buffer.
> >
> > I'm not sure we should use text properties or overlays for that,
> > though. The region could be part of the command that turns on the
> > mode with region limits stored in markers.
>
> A typical LilyPond score file switches into Scheme thousands of times
> (most of the time just for a single scalar Scheme constant where an
> actual mode switch would not necessarily be required, but also for all
> user-defined functions and any non-trivial non-music expression).
Not sure what you are saying. Is it that a region with two ends is
not enough, and we need a list of regions? If so, I'm okay with that,
and I don't see any serious obstacles to implement that.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, martin rudalics, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/10