[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 10:17:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Przemysław Wojnowski <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Recently I was going through Emacs C code and immediately one thing
> come to my mind: "Did anyone consider rewrite it a more maintainable
> language?" :-)
Emacs is mostly written in Emacs Lisp. C is used only for the core.
Encapsulation, namespaces and modularity are not really an issue there
as it is a closed and confined working set.
They are an issue in Elisp. So if you are worried about
maintainability, rewriting Elisp into a more maintainable language would
be by far more effective.
--
David Kastrup
- Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/11
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/10/11
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, John Wiegley, 2015/10/11
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/11
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/10/11
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/11
- RE: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Drew Adams, 2015/10/11
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, John Wiegley, 2015/10/15
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/11
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/12
- Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/12