[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:04:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Eric Ludlam <address@hidden> writes:
> My main concern is about folks claiming CEDET is complicated (which it is)
> then oversimplifying the problem space to kick off some new thing which will
> likely end up just as complicated.
> I know I thought the problem space seemed simple when I started. I might not
> have started if I'd known how big it is.
I appreciate your experience and point of view in this, Eric, and definitely
want you to be a part of this conversation. This same phenomenon happens with
build tools: there's a new one almost every year, because everyone thinks
they're trivial, yet no one has ever fully solved the problem.
John
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/16
- Re: IDE, Lluís, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/16
- Re: IDE, Stephen Leake, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/14
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/14