[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making --with-wide-int the default
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Making --with-wide-int the default |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:12:14 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:26:27 +0200
>
> > What is "non-native" about 'long long int'?
>
> Register lengths and opcodes. You need two registers for every
> operation, and several opcodes.
Yes, and the compiler already implements that in the most efficient
way possible.
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default (was: Dynamic loading progress), (continued)
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Paul Eggert, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/16
- Re: Making --with-wide-int the default, David Kastrup, 2015/10/16