|
From: | Przemysław Wojnowski |
Subject: | Re: IDE |
Date: | Sun, 18 Oct 2015 00:28:16 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
W dniu 18.10.2015 o 00:07, Dmitry Gutov pisze:
On 10/18/2015 01:03 AM, Przemysław Wojnowski wrote:I think it is not a problem. An IDE could switch (or enable) language backend depending on current language. For C-like (or maybe statically typed in general) languages (covering most of programming world) could use Semantic, for other languages maybe something other (like tern for JS).It would be better if we could support a set of common operations for both static and dynamic languages. If those were implemented by Semantic by static languages, more power to it.
I don't think it is possible, because languages are very different and their surrounding tooling is very different.
Yes. And I've looked at EDE at SF (http://sourceforge.net/p/cedet/git/ci/master/tree/lisp/cedet/ede/). There's support for many types of projects, build tools, etc. There are even some tests.The EDE subthread also brought up some ideas for project.el.Does that mean that you don't want to reuse EDE, but reimplement everything from scratch? Don't you think it would be better to reuse what already is and just change parts of it to be more flexible?Have you looked at lisp/progmodes/project.el yet?
What's the point of reimplementing that from scratch?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |