[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: In support of guile-emacs
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: In support of guile-emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:22:46 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber <at> dustycloud.org> writes:
>
> There's been a lot of conversation on this list that's been discussing
> whether or not the Guile port of emacs could be a good basis.
A purely theoretical question: how well defined is the interface
between elisp and the underlying core? Is there some specification
or an automated test suite against which an implementation on top of
a new VM can be implemented?
Or is it purely a trial and error process? Implement Elisp
on top of a VM and see if something breaks, and that's your test suite?
- In support of guile-emacs, Christopher Allan Webber, 2015/10/18
- Re: In support of guile-emacs, Artur Malabarba, 2015/10/18
- Re: In support of guile-emacs, Xue Fuqiao, 2015/10/18
- Re: In support of guile-emacs, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/19
- Re: In support of guile-emacs, David Kastrup, 2015/10/19
- Re: In support of guile-emacs, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/19
- Re: In support of guile-emacs, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/19
- Re: In support of guile-emacs, David Kastrup, 2015/10/19
Re: In support of guile-emacs,
Tom <=