|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add shell-quasiquote. |
Date: | Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:59:46 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 |
On 10/20/2015 07:41 PM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
I'm afraid it's effectively the same thing as using shell-quote-argument directly in my code. It puts the responsibility on me, because if shell-quote-argument breaks and I don't react fast enough to change shqq--quote-string, it's my fault for having used a definition of shqq--quote-string that was prone to breakage.
So it would be okay if shell-quote-argument breaks and thus makes major functionality in Emacs vulnerable, but your tiny function in its small package is safe and sound? That's a nice set of priorities.
Regarding responsibility, I repeat: contributing package to ELPA means that that the developers here share some of it.
And your function, speaking in security terms, adds to the attack surface, not subtracts from it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |