[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:10:03 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> > > Raw TAGS files are more or less unsuitable for anything but C and Lisp,
> > > and are pretty poor even for that (e.g. you can only jump from uses to
> > > definitions, the definition can only be in one place...)
> >
> > Raw TAGS files are not supposed to be used for anything but
> > definitions.
>
> Where "definition" can be whatever you want, AFAIK.
"Definition" in this context means the implementation. There's only
one implementation, but there might be many references
(a.k.a. "calls").
> A TAGS file is just an index. You can index whatever you like,
> AFAIK.
An index where the key is the symbol itself can only hold one instance
of every symbol.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/25
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26