[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:20:05 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:15:11 +0300
>
> On 10/24/2015 08:11 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > We already support both, don't we?
>
> For find-references, let's say yes. But not for find-definition, unless
> you include the GNU ELPA package.
Why cannot we bundle it?
> > My point was that the format of the database is not really important,
> > certainly not to the user.
>
> A user might like fast project re-scanning, I imagine.
If etags is not fast enough, then the user can switch the back-end.
Once again, the issue is not the format of the database. That's
immaterial.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Marcus Harnisch, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Oleh Krehel, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/27
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/11
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/11