[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the popularity of git
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: On the popularity of git |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:13:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> Alan Mackenzie writes:
>
> > Not at all. There are 20, 30, or 50 options which all consciously
> > have to be omitted.
>
> Which 6 letters in the word "option" didn't you read as you typed it?
I must say that I am quite curious about the concept of "consciously
omitting options". With most command line programs, I am pretty sure
that I am constantly omitting options unconsciously since "omitting"
them "consciously" would require that unconsciously calling a program
would involve typing every conceivable option in, and only consciousness
makes every unneeded option disappear from the command line.
I mean, even if my usual way of keyboard entry would be to fall asleep
on the keyboard whenever I have to type options, I am pretty sure that
I'd miss a few ones by default.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], (continued)
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], Yuri Khan, 2015/10/30
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/10/30
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], Oleh Krehel, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], David Kastrup, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: On the popularity of git, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git, David Kastrup, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/31
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], Juanma Barranquero, 2015/10/30
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], David Kastrup, 2015/10/30
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], Juanma Barranquero, 2015/10/30
- Re: On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?], David Kastrup, 2015/10/30
- Re: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/29
- Re: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/29
- Re: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?, Davis Herring, 2015/10/29