Re: On language-dependent defaults for character-folding

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> The discussion (with a few exceptions) is about how to augment the current
> implementation to make it more acceptable to various needs and cultures. So
> I think it's directly related to the pretest, and so moving it to
> emacs-tangents would be wrong.

In that case, can you please propose a plan for reaching such acceptability?
If I can clearly see what we're aiming toward, it will give me a context for
reading these messages, and help focus the discussion.

For example: makes exactly it not acceptable today? what are the desirable
features of an "ideal implementation"? what are the variables we're trying to
hammer down? etc. Then I think we can meaningfully tackle this issue by
breaking it into the smaller pieces that make it up.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature