[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:48:01 +0200 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:11:43 -0800
>
> On 03/02/2016 09:47 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> > And then I thought -- well, if we should have a literal syntax for
> > Unicode control characters, why not for all of them?
> Something like that would make sense. The escape sequence should bracket
> the name, so that the escape sequences could be used in strings without
> ambiguity. Something like \u[NAME], say.
Unicode's UTS#18 (http://unicode.org/reports/tr18/) proposes \N[NAME]
instead, albeit in the context of regular expressions. Perhaps we
should adopt that instead.
- Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/03
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, John Wiegley, 2016/03/03
- RE: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Drew Adams, 2016/03/03
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/03
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Philipp Stephani, 2016/03/05
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, John Wiegley, 2016/03/05
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Philipp Stephani, 2016/03/06
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/06
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Philipp Stephani, 2016/03/06
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/06
- Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters, Philipp Stephani, 2016/03/06