[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Nov 2016 00:13:41 -0400 |
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Phillip Lord <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I made some minor changes in the file. Please make sure to leave 2
>> spaces between sentences, per our conventions (your commit log
>> messages have the same problem, btw).
>
> Yes, indeed, I do forget this often. It's a convention I have long
> dropped in my normal writing if I ever did it. I will try and remember.
>
> Incidentally, M-q seems to remove the double space. Am I doing it wrong?
That probably means you've set sentence-end-double-space to nil. The
Emacs repo has a .dir-locals.el file that sets it to t, but if you're
using magit it currently won't apply when writing commit messages, see
https://github.com/magit/magit/issues/2848
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, (continued)
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Elias MÃ¥rtenson, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/06
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Noam Postavsky <=