[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:53:25 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> What we do know is that we get very few bug reports for Windows 98/95.
That suggests we don't have many users on those systems.
We could put in code in the next release to display a message,
"If you use GNU Emacs on Windows 95 or Windows 98,
please send email to <some email address>. We are thinking
of deleting the support for those systems in a future Emacs version."
> The only thing that I could think of further to get more information
> would be to check the download logs; does ftp.gnu.org store user agent
> strings or equivalent. This would at least give us some evidence about
> Windows 9x -- also Windows XP.
That is a good idea.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, (continued)
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/10
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, martin rudalics, 2016/11/09
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/15
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/07