[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pretty printing frames from *Backtrace* (WAS: Rant on ...)
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: pretty printing frames from *Backtrace* (WAS: Rant on ...) |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 22:09:35 -0500 |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Michael Heerdegen
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Here is what I use, more or less, I hope I succeeded to dissolve it from
> all dependencies from my personal stuff.
>
> Could be you must compile it to get backtrace frame counting working
> correctly. The implemented commands are those bound in the
> debugger-mode-map at the file's end.
It seems to be 2 frames off non-compiled, and not working at all when
compiled. But I think it's something that is sorely lacking from the
debugger currently.
>
> This is just for trying. Would it be worth it to make this a package?
>
I think it would be easier to integrate directly into the debugger, it
would probably save the trouble of cumbersome frame counting.
- Re: pretty printing frames from *Backtrace* (WAS: Rant on ...),
Noam Postavsky <=