|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: Preview: portable dumper |
Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:13:37 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
On 11/29/2016 10:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
If we don't attract more core developers, we will never get out of this vicious cycle.
Although we certainly could use more core developers, it's quite a stretch to say that switching from unexec to a portable undumper will scare recruits away. On the contrary, the portable approach is simpler and easier for non-experts than what we have now.
I don't agree, as C is an essential component of GNU/Linux and is robustly represented in the practical and research programming communities. (For what it's worth, C's popularity is ranked #7 in PyPL and #2 in TIOBE.) Although it'd be fine to replacing the core Emacs interpreter with something better if we can scare up developer resources to do that, in the meantime it's OK to assume C expertise for people modifying the Emacs interpreter.C programmers are a dying breed
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |