[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preview: portable dumper
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Preview: portable dumper |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Nov 2016 22:07:26 +0200 |
> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:11:15 -0800
>
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > By contrast, dumping code is a central and mandatory part of building Emacs
> > and of its startup process. It cannot be ignored or made optional.
>
> Could we ask Daniel to include his code under an #ifdef, so until it's proven
> we can always disable it, or back out the changes easily if need be?
What would that solve? Don't we still need to review the patches,
compile the code once in a while, debug it as needed, etc.?
> I'd like to entertain the experiment, if we can.
Fine, but why do you need me for that? What would be my role in that
experiment?
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, (continued)
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/28
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/11/28
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/28
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/11/28
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/29
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/11/29
- Re: Preview: portable dumper,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/11/29
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/29
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, John Wiegley, 2016/11/29
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/11/30
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/29
Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/29