[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preview: portable dumper
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Preview: portable dumper |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Dec 2016 10:28:25 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 17:24:55 -0500
>
> > No. I mean that bytecomp.el would generate a file in a format which
> > pdumper can use (which has various consequences, such as the fact that
> > .elc files aren't portable any more).
>
> That seems like a big disadvantage to me. This could be sufficient
> reason just by itself to stick with the current format for elc files.
> People expect to install one elc file and have it work in multple
> Emacs versions.
That's true, but note that Guile produces non-portable byte-compiled
files since long ago. The Guile developers did that on purpose and
they think it's TRT. I was at least initially surprised when I
learned about that.
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, (continued)
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/02
- RE: Preview: portable dumper, Drew Adams, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/03
- RE: Preview: portable dumper, Drew Adams, 2016/12/03
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/03
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Joost Kremers, 2016/12/03
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/03
- Re: Preview: portable dumper,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Daniel Colascione, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Ken Raeburn, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/02
- Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/02
Re: Preview: portable dumper, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/01