Re: EMACS_INT to EMACS_UINT

[Paul Eggert]

On 12/04/2016 03:16 PM, Ravi Desai wrote:
> Is this something that we should change? The code is working

I'm not sure what you'd change. In many places the Emacs C code relies 
on the fact that unsigned arithmetic is modulo 2**N, where N is the 
width of the unsigned integer, so that (for example) converting -1 to 
unsigned yields UINT_MAX. XLI and XIL are intended for low-level use, 
where this part of C semantics is assumed to be well-understood.