Re: Lisp-friendly backtraces [was: Lispy backtraces]

[Clément Pit--Claudel]

On 2016-12-05 09:37, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Removing `backtrace' from eval.c makes the patch much harder to read,
>> so I'll do that later.
> 
> M-x diff-unified->context RET
> 
> should solve this apparent problem.

Neat!  I've attached a cleaner patch, including documentation and a Changelog 
entry.

Help with the following warning would be much appreciated:

  eval.c:3436:1: warning: no previous prototype for ‘backtrace_frame_apply’ 
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
   backtrace_frame_apply (Lisp_Object function, union specbinding *pdl)
   ^

(why does this specific function cause this warning, while other newly 
introduced functions don't?)

Thanks,
Clément.

0001-Move-backtrace-to-ELisp-using-a-new-mapbacktrace-pri.patch
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature