[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: String interpolation
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: String interpolation |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:29:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
On 2016-12-11 04:35, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Is there a reason why people are writing (funcall '+ 3.42423 4)
> rather than (+ 3.42423 4)?
I wondered too :) But Lars' examples were written that way, so I did the same
to ease comparison.
Clément.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, (continued)
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Yuri Khan, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/10
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Yuri Khan, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation,
Clément Pit--Claudel <=
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Helmut Eller, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/11
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/12