Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:07:50 -0500
> 
> On 2016-12-15 14:59, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > IMO, it would be interesting to see where this will take us, and what
> > kind of performance could that produce.
> 
> This sounds like a good idea; I wonder how much it will break, though.  Many 
> external packages don't (require) preloaded packages (some preloaded packages 
> don't or used to not export a (provide), in fact), which may cause issues if 
> these packages aren't preloaded anymore.

Autoloading should fix that.  This idea won't work anyway without
adding the relevant symbols to loaddefs.el.