[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch
From: |
Nikolaus Rath |
Subject: |
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Dec 2016 08:56:25 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
On Dec 29 2016, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Nikolaus Rath <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:58:53 -0800
>>
>> >> I would hope that Emacs is used not only to edit its own source code but
>> >> also other code, for which these standards don't apply.
>> >
>> > It is, but how is that relevant to the issue at hand? The issue at
>> > hand is how does open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start affect C code
>> > editing. The intent of my reference to GNU standards was to point
>> > out that having an opening brace in column zero is a very frequent
>> > situation in the C sources of any GNU project, and therefore saying
>> > this convention is not useful for C flies in the face of the reality
>> > right under our feet.
>>
>> What I meant is that setting open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start to t
>> in general is not a good idea, because it does not work for all C
>> files. So for this option to be useful, you'd have to do set it
>> conditionally - which IMO restricts its usefulness a lot.
>
> We have that option set to t for a long time, so the decision whether
> to do it was already made, and any problems that could cause are
> already with us.
Yes. Therefore, I think applying a patch that eliminates the need for it
completely would be a good thing.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/27
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch,
Nikolaus Rath <=
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/29
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/29
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Andreas Röhler, 2016/12/30
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/28
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/25
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/25