[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:42:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> http://www.fsf.org/news/2009-05-cisco-settlement.html
> Seems I just dislike the idea of enforced freedom
Enforced freedom? nobody there was obligated to benefit from freedom.
What was enforced was the obligation for Cisco to transfer to their
clients the freedom they decided to enjoy.
In my mind, the above is one of the clearest examples of the benefit of GPL.
Without this, I wouldn't have been able to use OpenWRT on my home router
for so many years (and other third party firmwares before that), and
I likely wouldn't use BananaPis for my home servers (made possible by the
obligation of Allwinner to distribute the source code of their port of
the Linux kernel).
[ Not sure what I'd use instead of BananaPis, all other alternatives
seem to use up a lot more power or to lack the reliability of SATA. ]
Stefan
Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Dmitry Gutov, 2017/07/13
Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Andreas Röhler, 2017/07/18
- Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Paul Eggert, 2017/07/18
- Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Andreas Röhler, 2017/07/18
- Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Andreas Röhler, 2017/07/19
- Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, tomas, 2017/07/19
- Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/19
Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/13