[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:49:44 +0300 |
> From: Richard Copley <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:02:05 +0100
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Angelo Graziosi <address@hidden>,
> Emacs Development <address@hidden>
>
> On 7 September 2017 at 20:26, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Try putting an 'eassume (0 <= nglyphs);' before the line in question.
>
> The warning goes away.
OK, I will commit that change, then.
> By the way, there's another warning which is both true and easy to fix.
> "(1 << ((n) % 32)))" should read "(1u << ((n) % 32)))" on line 2191.
>
> CC w32font.o
> w32font.c: In function 'font_supported_scripts':
> w32font.c:2191:32: warning: result of '1 << 31' requires 33 bits to
> represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Wshift-overflow=]
> if (subranges[(n) / 32] & (1 << ((n) % 32))) \
> ^
> w32font.c:2246:3: note: in expansion of macro 'SUBRANGE'
> SUBRANGE (31, Qsymbol);
> ^~~~~~~~
> w32font.c:2191:32: warning: result of '1 << 31' requires 33 bits to
> represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Wshift-overflow=]
> if (subranges[(n) / 32] & (1 << ((n) % 32))) \
> ^
> w32font.c:2308:3: note: in expansion of macro 'SUBRANGE'
> SUBRANGE (95, Qtai_le);
> ^~~~~~~~
Yes, I've seen this and have a fix for it. Thanks.
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, (continued)
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Herring, Davis, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Angelo Graziosi, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Angelo Graziosi, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/07
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/07
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/07
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/07
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/08
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/08
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/08
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/08
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/08
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/08
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Copley, 2017/09/09
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/09