[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:45:07 +0300 |
> From: Fabrice Popineau <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:33:48 +0200
> Cc: Andy Moreton <address@hidden>, Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> Ok. I see your eassert() added at this point.
> But clearly there is a problem with GCC 7, because it doesn't understand
> the implications of this eassert() :
Does eassume instead of eassert help?
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, (continued)
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Richard Stallman, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/14
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Andy Moreton, 2017/09/14
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/16
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/17