Re: `thunk-let'?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > Maybe a better option is to add a `require` in the expansion of
>> > lazy-let?
> But then we need to wrap it in `eval-and-compile' because we want to
> expand the (macro) `thunk-delay' that appears in the expansion at
> compile time.

Yeah, pretty ugly.  Now I see why my intuition told me that lazy-let
should be in thunk.el ;-)


        Stefan