[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Nov 2017 11:27:08 +0100 |
> I guess I'm an exceptional user, then, because I complain about it a
> lot. It's very much in embarrassing-pause territory here.
>
>> Also I think a non-moving GC will be a lot easier to accommodate.
>
> I suspect that I don't fully understand the benefits of a moving GC,
> because memory fragmentation alone simply has never been a problem for
> me.
If there is an embarrassing-pause, then using a non-incremental copying
collector won't help anyway. OTOH XEmacs has an incremental mark and
sweep collector so Emacs should be able to remove the embarrassing-pause
without copying. But I never looked at the respective codes of XEmacs
and SpiderMonkey so maybe I'm missing something.
martin
- Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, (continued)
Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/24
- Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, Pip Cet, 2017/11/24
- Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/24
- Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, Pip Cet, 2017/11/25
- Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/25
- Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, Paul Eggert, 2017/11/25
- Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/26
Re: [EXPERIMENT] Emacs with the SpiderMonkey garbage collector,
martin rudalics <=