Re: git log question

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stephen Berman <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:00:54 +0100
> 
> I thought if I call `git log <commit> -1' on the current branch, it will
> only show <commit> if it is in the current branch, but I just discovered
> this is not so: I called it with master current and <commit> being one I
> knew was only in emacs-26, but nevertheless it showed that commit.

Isn't that because we merge from emacs-26 to master, and that commit
was merged as part of that?