Re: What `case' have done you? [Was: Re: Replace trivial pcase occurrences in the Emacs sources]

[Michael Heerdegen]

"Garreau, Alexandre" <address@hidden> writes:

> There are quite some (long) cases where only matching characters or
> symbols: is it really that problematic to use `case' (though, in such
> common functions body, I wouldn’t find cond+assoc natural either)?

That's what we discuss here.  However, the suggested patch isn't meant
to answer this question.  I only want to clear up some pcase
occurrences.  If developers later decide to replace such occurrences
with case or whatever, I can still do it.


Michael.