[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: modern regexes in emacs
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: modern regexes in emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:33:57 -0500 |
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:36:13 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> I proposed to have a separate set of functions that will accept PCRE
> syntax. That would allow everyone to have what they want: you to
> use the "classic" regexps, and those who want PCRE to have that.
> Where's the problem with that?
There is no problem. It is the way Emacs has always adapted to the
times, and I think it's a great solution.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, (continued)
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/02/26
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Perry E. Metzger, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Juri Linkov, 2019/02/17
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/17
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Alan Mackenzie, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Alan Mackenzie, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs,
Perry E. Metzger <=
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/15
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Van L, 2019/02/19
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/17
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Philippe Vaucher, 2019/02/18
- Re: modern regexes in emacs, Mattias Engdegård, 2019/02/18