[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#3
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044) |
Date: |
Fri, 03 May 2019 18:47:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> > * doc/lispref/processes.texi (Filter Functions): Use
>> > insert-before-markers in the "ordinary" filter example, like
>> > internal-default-process-filter does.
>>
>> In my experience, insert-before-markers is a source of problems down the
>> road, so I'd recommend not to encourage its use by showing it in example
>> code where it's not strictly needed.
>
> But it's an example about "mimicking the actions of the default
> filter" which does currently use insert-before-markers.
But do we really want to mimic that undesirable part of the behavior?
Stefan
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044), Noam Postavsky, 2019/05/01
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044), Noam Postavsky, 2019/05/03
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044), Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/04
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044), Noam Postavsky, 2019/05/07
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044), Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/07
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044), Noam Postavsky, 2019/05/09
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044), Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/10