From: Alp Aker <address@hidden>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 12:38:44 -0400
Cc: ?scar Fuentes <address@hidden>,
Emacs devel <address@hidden>
Please note that that's already what this implementation does with the stretch
glyph. If you think
that behavior is wrong, then the treatment of the stretch glyph should be
changed as well.
The stretch glyph was there before the indicator, but the indicator is
a new entity. I have no idea what the users will want, I'm just
pointing out the implications. This sub-thread started from the use
case of the region, but the proposed solution will change the face in
many other use cases. If that's what the users will want, fine.