Re: TRAMP VC optimization: also breaks process filters -_-

[Stefan Monnier]

> Yes, the analysis is correct. However, we don't need to check this for
> every Tramp invocation.

Indeed, when the first arg of expand-file-name is absolute the second
arg shouldn't matter.

> Daniel's reports have been covered always
> vc-registered. And indeed, the related `tramp-vc-file-name-handler'
> seems to expect always a Tramp file name, which is not true for filters
> and sentinels which run for non-Tramp processes.

I don't understand what filers and sentinels have to do with it.

> Daniel, does the appended patch fixes the issue for you?

The patch looks good to me, at least,


        Stefan