|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Why is FUNC in cl-callf not allowed to be an expression? |
Date: | Thu, 16 May 2019 19:06:55 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> What do think now about `gv-place-let'? Does that look acceptable? The existence of both `gv-letplace` and `gv-place-let` is kind of problematic for the occasional user who'll struggle to remember which is which. So I think it needs a name which clarifies the difference. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |