Re: Declaring cl.el obsolete

[조성빈]

> 2019. 5. 24. 오전 2:03, Romanos Skiadas <address@hidden> 작성:
> 
> On 23/05/2019 09:50, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>>> I think there's a probably a gazillion out-of-tree packages out there
>>> with (require 'cl),
>> OK, "722,834 code results" is a bit smaller than "gazillion", but:
>> 
>> https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22%28require+%27cl%29%22+extension%3Ael&type=Code&ref=advsearch&l=&l=
>> 
>> (You apparently have to be logged in to do the search.)
>> 
> This is slightly misleading, it seems like github also takes into account 
> (require 'cl-lib), e.g. it matched
> 
> https://github.com/chetnashah/dotemacs/blob/f6b1d41d52000e70ec970499c98e424af3cd2e40/.emacs.d/elpa/slime-20160907.602/contrib/slime-listener-hooks.el
>  
> 
> from page 100:
> 
> https://github.com/search?l=&p=100&q=%22%28require+%27cl%29%22+extension%3Ael&ref=advsearch&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93

I also see GitHub matching (require ‘cl-lib) from page 3:

Matched 
https://github.com/martialboniou/Dots/blob/e116fb08e406243f847af63760877d7c6d14a91c/emacs/emacs.d.symlink/lisp/run-tests.el
At 
https://github.com/search?p=3&q=%22%28require+%27cl%29%22+extension%3Ael

> And it also takes into account comments and ifs for older Emacsen, which 
> presumably are ok.
> 
> - Romanos
> 
>