[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: encode-time vs decode-time
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: encode-time vs decode-time |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:21:35 +0300 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:48:21 -0700
> Cc: Andy Moreton <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> OK, after some cogitation I installed something along those lines into
> master. I
> called the new function 'time-convert' by analogy with the existing functions
> time-add etc. So now, as you suggested, encode-time has reverted to its old
> role
> of converting from decoded timestamps to Lisp timestamps and its API is now
> simpler.
Thanks, but judging by the changes in Lisp files all over, it sounds
like this is a backward-incompatible change? That'd be unfortunate.
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Paul Eggert, 2019/08/05
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Paul Eggert, 2019/08/06
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/06
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Paul Eggert, 2019/08/06
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Stefan Monnier, 2019/08/06
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/07
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/08/11
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Paul Eggert, 2019/08/17
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/08/07
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Paul Eggert, 2019/08/17
- Re: encode-time vs decode-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/08/17