|
| From: | Paul Eggert |
| Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 6cd5678: Clarify compiler-pacifier in frame.c |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:33:22 -0700 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Let's suppose that the warning was correct and the hacker was wrong when judged it bogus.The warning was correct, and I didn't decide it was bogus. I added the initialization because the warning was NOT bogus.
No, actually that GCC warning was a false alarm, in that the initialization was not needed: even without the initialization the C code has well-defined behavior because no uninitialized object is ever used.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |