[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient |
Date: |
Fri, 01 May 2020 22:27:47 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> If we decide the answer is yes (as advised by the coding conventions) we
> could start by simply aliasing the existing API that does not follow this
> convention. That'd mean `copy-alist` would be aliased as `alist-copy`, do
> you think people would be strongly against this?
I think there is no need to rigidly put the crucial word 'alist'
at the start of the name. Just having 'alist' in the function name
makes it easy enough to find that function.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, (continued)
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/05/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, João Távora, 2020/05/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient,
Richard Stallman <=