Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs

[조성빈]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> 작성:

> > From: Philippe Vaucher <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 16:05:29 +0200
> > Cc: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>, Emacs developers  
> > <address@hidden>,
> >         Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> >  I can only talk about the stuff I'm familiar with.  Let others bring
> >  up counter-arguments from other places.  But while doing that, let's
> >  remember to compare the sizes of the languages, because a small enough
> >  language can definitely use an exhaustive list of candidates to the
> >  benefit of the users.
> >
> > I don't understand why we still need to come up with examples of other  
> > languages (in other languages they
> > usually have namespaces as the norm), but here's a list of examples:
> >
> > https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.2.0/File.html
>
> Thank you.  This shows 60 file-related functions.

Which… are all file-related. For example, if I want to know about whether a
file exists or not, I can go to the File:: and find out there’s a  
File::exist? method.

>  Does anyone want to
> look through a list that long to find what they need?  I don't.
>
> (Funnily enough, "C-u C-h a file-name RET" also shows 63 functions
> and commands.)

"C-u C-h a file exist RET” on the other hand, gives me 9 functions in my  
current session
(with functions totally unrelated, like ones from company-mode).

This particular function is easy to find, since it employs the prefix scheme,
so I can just guess it starts with file and type file-exi and let  
autocomplete help me,
but it still illustrates that C-u C-h a isn’t great enough.