[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces - summary, conclusion
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Namespaces - summary, conclusion |
Date: |
Mon, 4 May 2020 11:25:20 -0700 (PDT) |
> > This one should be under the `file-name-` prefix.
> > Almost all other file-name manipulation functions are already there.
>
> That works for me.
Actually, it's most, but not almost all.
There are quite a few functions dealing
with file names that have `filename',
not `file-name', in their name. I'm
guessing that includes some that might
be called "file-name manipulation"
functions. (I see none, however that
use `filename-' as a _prefix_.)
(And no, such inconsistency is not very
important, IMO.)
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, (continued)
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, 조성빈, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, 조성빈, 2020/05/05
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/04
- RE: Namespaces - summary, conclusion,
Drew Adams <=
Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/04
Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, chad, 2020/05/04