[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient |
Date: |
Tue, 05 May 2020 19:13:50 +0300 |
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 00:39:41 +0900
>
> > Thanks, but in long lists of loosely-related items, it is usually
> > better to arrange them in alphabetical order, since it makes it easier
> > to find what you need.
>
> The items are not loosely related once grouped and the list is not long.
The list is almost 30 items long.
> Putting the list arbitrarily in alphabetical order adds to its complexity.
Sorry, I disagree. And we had in the past bug reports that requested
alphabetical order in similar list (I don't remember if this one was
one of them), so I think people generally like this better.
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, (continued)
- RE: [ELPA] New package: transient, Drew Adams, 2020/05/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/03
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/05
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/03
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, João Távora, 2020/05/03
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/03
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, João Távora, 2020/05/03