> it's clear that s.el and dash.el want to be (very)
> short-prefixed, by their very nature, otherwise
> they lose their charm.
What is that "very nature"? Something specific
about them?
Wouldn't a short prefix bestow the same charm
on any library?
It's a serious question, not rhetorical or
whimsical. Is there something special about
these libraries that calls for, or fits
particularly well, with a short prefix?
Or is it just that they're already out there
with short prefixes (and the charm they bestow)?
Yep, you're right. A short prefix would be good for any library. It's just that these two were bold enough to try it and (not yet) get away with it.
João