ELPA policy (was: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden,
>   address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden,
>   address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 23:38:23 -0400
> 
> I made the first efforts to get it integrated into GNU ELPA (and Phil
> did the heavy lifting), so no I definitely don't think it's problematic.

FWIW, I took a cursory look at dash.el in ELPA, and was surprised to
see that its doc strings are not according to our coding conventions,
and functions/macros that clearly aren't internal don't follow the
naming conventions.

So maybe it's time we defined the minimum requirements for packages to
be included in ELPA?