[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Ema
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2020 14:51:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 06/05/2020 22.43, Richard Stallman wrote:
> It is not terrible lot of work for people to deal with those issues,
> but I wouldn't assume a simple program can.
These days assignments are signed with PGP keys. Commits can also be signed
using PGP keys. Wouldn't that provide an reliable way to pair up contributors
who have assigned copyright with their contributions?
Concretely, the suggestion is that going forward, address@hidden would sign the
keys used to sign copyright forms that it receives. Then contributors would
use the same keys to sign patches, and maintainers would just have to query the
keyserver to check if the patch author has copyright papers on file.
(The suggestion is not that all Emacs commits should be signed; only that
people who don't have commit access but have signed copyright papers could
indicate that by signing their commits with the key they used to sign their
copyright papers)
Would that not work?
Clément.
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, T.V Raman, 2020/05/08
- Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/08
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Phillip Lord, 2020/05/08
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, João Távora, 2020/05/08
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/08
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/08
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/08
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/09
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/09
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Andreas Röhler, 2020/05/09
Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/11
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/11
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2020/05/11
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/11
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/11
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/11
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/11
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/12
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/05/12
- Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/12